Implicating vaginal → female
Link to implication

Reason:

Cause a lot of posts I find don't tag female in there tags so I get a lot of results I don't want

...This is probably the worst suggestion I have seen for a while. maleherm, herm and andromorph all have vaginas, but none of them are female.

hatesfoxes99 said:
Implicating vaginal → female
Link to implication

Reason:

Cause a lot of posts I find don't tag female in there tags so I get a lot of results I don't want

Since this is the world of fantasy anthro characters, within the customizable media of art, genitals can show up on all kinds of characters and are not exclusively for female characters.

If you want to rid of any vaginal/pussy related stuff that isn't female you can utilize tag combos like pussy -female or vaginal -female in your blacklist to only show vaginal/pussy related posts only if the post is tagged female

-1. A terrible suggestion that would restrict searches for specific intersex instances that make use of that tag.

ImpidiDinkaDoo said:
Since this is the world of fantasy anthro characters, within the customizable media of art, genitals can show up on all kinds of characters and are not exclusively for female characters.

If you want to rid of any vaginal/pussy related stuff that isn't female you can utilize tag combos like pussy -female or vaginal -female in your blacklist to only show vaginal/pussy related posts only if the post is tagged female

I'm, like, ninety-something percent sure hatesfoxes was saying he was having the opposite problem...

Also, he was complaining that people aren't tagging things properly, so his blacklist doesn't work...

Jacob said:
I'm, like, ninety-something percent sure hatesfoxes was saying he was having the opposite problem...

Also, he was complaining that people aren't tagging things properly, so his blacklist doesn't work...

There's not much we can do about the lack of tagging, but an incorrect implication wouldn't help. If they are willing to show us their blacklist, we can probably improve it (for example, blacklisting pussy intersex over pussy herm and pussy cuntboy, since intersex is more commonly tagged).

Alternatively, they can just use pussy -intersex when searching; it'll still not be "flawless", but it'll still be because of the lack of tags. If they're willing to list tags that are missing or shouldn't be there, some people can work on that.

It sucks that people aren't adept at tagging, but that's unavoidable on e621.

Jacob said:
I'm, like, ninety-something percent sure hatesfoxes was saying he was having the opposite problem...

Also, he was complaining that people aren't tagging things properly, so his blacklist doesn't work...

The user is looking for only female posts involving vaginal and pussy posts. In a normal search, yes, my suggestion would provide the opposite effect. HOWEVER, in a blacklist, what I suggested can indeed work as I said. In blacklists, having multiple tags on one line with one beginning with - means posts with the tag will only show IF it includes one or more of the tags that have - in front of them. I'd recommend reading up on blacklist help

Besides that, yeah, it can also be a problem with people not properly tagging content. In that case, best solution for that is reporting people who don't properly tag.

ImpidiDinkaDoo said:
Cause a lot of posts I find don't tag female in there tags so I get a lot of results I don't want

The user is looking for only female posts involving vaginal and pussy posts.

I'm not sure if this is even accurate
I can't tell what this user is even going for

I've run a number of search combinations on their favourites and the only gender tags I can't find tied to vaginal are gynomorph and herm
But gynomorph and herm explicit posts are present, as are andromorph vaginal. In fact a good half of the vaginal favourites are andromorph, and all of the vaginal female posts either have their breasts heavily obscured, untagged, or on a minor background character. The foreground of that post is male/male

My logic tells me that what this user actually wants to avoid are breasts, but is trying to do so in a roundabout way that would actually impact a lot of posts they're comfortable with?
What stands out the most to me are the straight vaginal posts with breasts clearly visible but untagged, and my only explanation for that is lack of awareness in all of: the tagging system, post contents, and which tags are actually present on a given post.
Requested implication reads like a confused stab-in-the-dark about why they're getting posts they don't want, without a clear understanding of how to find what they do want.

A lot of assumption here but there's really not much more to go on. I'm really just long-windedly trying to explain they're likely not exclusively looking for female posts, but also not trying to exclude female posts that don't have prominent breasts, independently of whether breasts are present enough to be taggable.

Either way a big -1 from me for the implication request
But that should go without saying

lmao no