Implicating black_yoshi → yoshi
Link to implication

Reason:

Also:
blue_yoshi → yoshi
brown_yoshi → yoshi
cyan_yoshi → yoshi
green_yoshi → yoshi
orange_yoshi → yoshi
pink_yoshi → yoshi
purple_yoshi → yoshi
red_yoshi → yoshi
white_yoshi → yoshi
yarn_yoshi → yoshi
yellow_yoshi → yoshi

beta_yoshi → yoshi
piranha_yoshi → yoshi
ship_yoshi → yoshi
winged_yoshi → yoshi

These are all Yoshis. Red Yoshi is a Yoshi, Winged Yoshi is a Yoshi and so on.

Aliases:

light_blue_yoshi → cyan_yoshi
They are the same. Even the yoshi wiki page shows this (links "cyan/light blue yoshi" to "cyan_yoshi").
light_blue_yoshi has only 3 posts whereas cyan_yoshi has 207.

blimp_yoshi → yoshi
Because blimp_yoshi is basically yoshi + inflation

Bump

Bumping.

Cyan to blue, because that's done with all other color things, like fur or clothing colors.

Also, are all the bottom ones actually canon? Checked and they are. However, blimp_yoshi seems indistinguishable from blue_yoshi inflation. I'd say alias to yoshi

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Cyan to blue, because that's done with all other color things, like fur or clothing colors.

Also, are all the bottom ones actually canon?

Don't know about the others, but I know winged yoshis exist.

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Cyan to blue, because that's done with all other color things, like fur or clothing colors.

Also, are all the bottom ones actually canon? Checked and they are. However, blimp_yoshi seems indistinguishable from blue_yoshi inflation. I'd say alias to yoshi

Tl;dr
+1 except
cyan_yoshi I-> yoshi
cyan_yoshi A-> blue_yoshi

blimp_yoshi I-> yoshi
blimp_yoshi A-> yoshi

MyNameIsOver20charac said:
Tl;dr
+1 except
cyan_yoshi I-> yoshi
cyan_yoshi A-> blue_yoshi

blimp_yoshi I-> yoshi
blimp_yoshi A-> yoshi

Agree with the blimp_yoshi alias, but I disagree with the cyan_yoshi one. Cyan and blue are different and deserve separate tags. Blue is much darker than cyan.

Why do we have all these color-specific Yoshi tags? That's not usually the case with how we approach species tags.

Bumping.

yFlash said:
Bumping.

You don't have to keep bumping your threads. They're not going anywhere, and bumping them won't give them any special treatment nor does it contribute anything at all. The admins handle requests eventually.

Y'know, I don't want to wait 2 years for this to get approved... especially for an obvious and needed implication like this. But I get what you mean, sorry I guess.

yFlash said:
Y'know, I don't want to wait 2 years for this to get approved... especially for an obvious and needed implication like this. But I get what you mean, sorry I guess.

Also, black Yoshi was approved. I can't tell you who did it oddly enough, but it was silent approval. Check your DMs and ask the admin about the other implications, you should have received a DMail by now.

Aight, I found what happened. Black Yoshi was implied 2 months ago, and Wuwu was aliased 19 days ago. The other colors of Yoshi needs to be either implied or aliased (usually, colors are aliased to the main species unless they're an entire separate subspecies called with a color), but in this case bumping had no effect; the implication was approved already...

I'd bring this up to Discord if I was you, this is where multiple alias/implication fields would be helpful so all of these could have been handled. Since this is an unusual occurrence, ask what should happen from here, since I don't know.

Now, to drive a point home, if this was vocally approved or if you add a post exclaiming that it's been approved, those are "acceptable" was to revive a topic. Merely saying "bump" doesn't help, it provides no information and only places the thread to the top of the page. If there's nothing left to say, don't do anything because the admins will handle it (eventually); if you have something to say, post it on the thread so others can react to it. It's just saying "bump" that doesn't help, the admins handle tag aliases and implications on their own time.

yFlash said:
Y'know, I don't want to wait 2 years for this to get approved... especially for an obvious and needed implication like this.

It's not that obvious. Species are not usually tagged by color, implicating these would set a bad precedence.

Aliasing them would probably be better.