Implicating soft_abs → abs
Link to implication

Reason:

EDIT: The tag implication soft_abs -> abs (forum #279001) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

ah, I made that the other day. soft_abs is it's own appearance. the impetus was I was tired of seeing feminine athletic characters with obviously developed but padded midsections without a tag for what that looks like. the abs tag is almost exclusively used for defined 6-packs so the implication would probably mess that up unless someone wants to make a 6-pack tag for what "abs" is currently and then dilute the heck out of the abs tag... yeah, I'm probably against that.

-1

(that blank "reason: " section tho)

sneezer22 said:
ah, I made that the other day. soft_abs is it's own appearance. the impetus was I was tired of seeing feminine athletic characters with obviously developed but padded midsections without a tag for what that looks like. the abs tag is almost exclusively used for defined 6-packs so the implication would probably mess that up unless someone wants to make a 6-pack tag for what "abs" is currently and then dilute the heck out of the abs tag... yeah, I'm probably against that.

-1

(that blank "reason: " section tho)

The abs tag generally is designed to cover any kind of muscle definition from the abdominal muscles, not "six-packs". Im aware i do refer to them in the wiki but dont state them as being a requirement for muscle definition. Of course that wiki definition was last edited at all almost 3 years ago, so it could use a update to clarify that.
As such i do not think it would mess up the tag, not any more then the big_pecs tag does the pecs tag, which means not at all since both are referring to the muscles, just big_pecs or your soft_abs refer to a particular type of expression of the muscles(think in the sense of races or breeds being a subclass of a species, soft_abs is simply a subclass of abs).

Darou said:
The abs tag generally is designed to cover any kind of muscle definition from the abdominal muscles, not "six-packs". Im aware i do refer to them in the wiki but dont state them as being a requirement for muscle definition. Of course that wiki definition was last edited at all almost 3 years ago, so it could use a update to clarify that.
As such i do not think it would mess up the tag, not any more then the big_pecs tag does the pecs tag, which means not at all since both are referring to the muscles, just big_pecs or your soft_abs refer to a particular type of expression of the muscles(think in the sense of races or breeds being a subclass of a species, soft_abs is simply a subclass of abs).

I'm cool with that. i just like having a tag that means "legit 6-pack" as well.

so maybe:
un-alias 6-pack(or tag of your choice)
v
move all the pics tagged abs to 6-pack
v
implicate soft_abs and 6-pack to abs
...

that way abs is what it was designed to be plus there are still specific tags for soft_abs and 6-pack appearances. thoughts?

The tag implication soft_abs -> abs (forum #279001) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.