Topic: Tag Implication: fast_food -> food

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

sneezer22 said:
...sometimes this tag is used for context purposes instead of just when there's food in the scene...

What about the Tag What You See policy?

Updated by anonymous

sneezer22 said:
yeah, but sometimes this tag is used for context purposes instead of just when there's food in the scene.

post #1972919 post #1647448

-1

do have to agree, 5 images here so far that do pertain to the worker or restaurant/employer rather then the food that is served. Other images under this tag may also pertain to the "dishware" you commonly get at these establishments rather then the food (food not being apparent in these cases, for example, a character carrying take out bags but contents of these bags not being visible(similar paper bags are often re-used for carrying bottles, drugs or medicine in)).

-1 to alias

Updated by anonymous

felix_nermix said:
We should follow the Tag What You See policy.

A implication as the tag is being used right now by many would not be in line with TWYS. Please read my prior reply to understand why.

Updated by anonymous

I don't like this implication. There's no description in the wiki. It could mean a lot of things.

What if there was a fast food related beverage?

beverage =/= food

Also what if there was an empty pizza box? It is fast food related, but there isn't food pictured.

Would these become fast_food_beverage and fast_food_container?

Fast food seems like it should be a base tag for anything fast food related, food or otherwise.

Updated by anonymous

  • 1