Implicating emitting_cum → cum_from_mouth
Link to implication

Reason:

emitting_cum is meant to be a less ambiguous replacement of cum_vomit (initially vomiting_cum, an unfortunate name I take full responsibility for, see forum #168716), so it should probably inherit the implication.

The tag being replaced had a long history of being used interchangably with cum_from_mouth due to the name, despite the wiki entry stating that it was specifically saying the following:

Unlike cum_through this is when a character has semen coming from its mouth in a way that's part of its body functions, such as in the cases of cock_transformation, snake_penis and other cases of non-standard sex-organs, although excluding cock_tongue.

Having said that, a nubmer of posts currently tagged emitting_cum aren't currently tagged with cum , which this implication might incorrectly add. I'm still debating whether or not the posts in emitting_cum -cum should be moved in some kind of separate emitting_precum tag, although there's no precum_from_mouth tag to imply to at the moment.

There's also the question of whether or not the original tag, cum_vomit, should be fully aliased to cum_from_mouth or whether repurposing it could be an option.

EDIT: The tag implication emitting_cum -> cum_from_mouth (forum #279232) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

I'm going through my old implication requests (given how old ones are to be rejected in bulk in the coming weeks), and I'm tempted to change side on this one.

Emitting cum is currently always shown with cum (precum has been moved to emitting precum a while ago) coming out of a character's mouth, but unlike the vomiting_cum tag it replaces, the name imply that on its own, and the wiki currently leaves the door open for... alternatives? I've been growing critical of "overoptimistic tag implications" in recent years, and while there aren't any examples I could find where cum_from_mouth isn't or shouldn't be there, cum_from_eyes comes back a handful of times, and one could imagine an example of emitting_cum in which it's the only way cum is emitted.

post #3483491 post #2426038

So yeah, maybe avoid cum_from_mouth amd have it simply imply cum instead.

The tag implication emitting_cum -> cum_from_mouth (forum #279232) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.