ok, this question should probably be bounced off someone with way more experience than me at tagging, but where is the line drawn in regards to anthro, semi-anthro and feral? I ask because I was browsing and came across this artist's work https://e621.net/post/index/1/cosmiclife
It seems the person posting this artist's work has been applying the same anthro and feral tags to almost every single image, but I'm having a hard time finding anthro features worthy of the tag. I see a few pics have characters with pseudo-hands. Or, a feral cougar, laying on a bed, should probably not have the anthro tag, even if that cougar is wearing a pair of underwear, or should he/she? Does clothing constitute anthro? This is not me trying to start drama, Im actually wondering if this is how it's defined. As far back as I've been browsing the site, anthro has always been defined as having humanoid features(physical features), but if that definition changed, I'd like to know.
Ive also seen the above tags applied to Pokemon, and while some pokemon are clearly feral, some others show humanoid characteristics, even in their normal base(feral?) form. Just curious if they are considered feral in their normal form, or anthro by proxy, seeing as how they are already anthro, or should they have the semi-anthro tag instead? (feral Lucario is the perfect example of this)
Updated by sneezer22