The tag implication #31982 transgender_(lore) -> trans_(lore) has been rejected.

Reason: It's only a matter of time before some images will be tagged 'transgender_(lore)' by accident/typo, or by people unaware that the current tag is named 'trans_(lore)', if it hasn't happened before. It'd be a good idea to pre-empt this problem.

EDIT: The tag implication transgender_(lore) -> trans_(lore) (forum #290221) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

EDIT: The tag implication transgender_(lore) -> trans_(lore) (forum #290221) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

This should be an alias instead of an implication then, shouldn't it?

watsit said:
This should be an alias instead of an implication then, shouldn't it?

D'oh! It absolutely should.

The tag implication transgender_(lore) -> trans_(lore) (forum #290221) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.

The tag implication transgender_(lore) -> trans_(lore) (forum #290221) has been rejected by @NotMeNotYou.