Can an image have multiple *_only tags as long as the items don't overlap? Or should the "and nothing else" in the wikis be interpreted strictly?

For example, post #2297159 has glasses and socks (arguably stockings, but that's a other discussion) . Would the presence of both invalidate socks_only, or could glasses_only be valid since she's still mostly_nude?

Similarly, post #2292486 has gloves and shoes. So should it have both gloves_only and shoes_only or neither?

Lastly, post #2271439 has socks and panties. I'm tempted to think that panties being more of a "core clothing" rather than something that could qualify for mostly_nude but that is also very subjective.

That clothing only, as it says in the wiki.
If the character is wearing something else too, then it's clearly not *_only.

Accessories don't count as clothing. A character can wear eyewear and still having a clothing_only tag. But you would not be able to tag glasses_only if the character is wearing clothing. Well the wiki states that minor clothing is an exception. Not entirely sure what that means, but if it means mostly_nude, then yes you can have both. I kind of disagree with the wiki's definition.

If there are multiple articles of clothing being worn, the only tags do not qualify.

panties and other underwear being worn do not qualify as mostly nude.

thevileone said:
Accessories don't count as clothing. A character can wear eyewear and still having a clothing_only tag. But you would not be able to tag glasses_only if the character is wearing clothing. Well the wiki states that minor clothing is an exception. Not entirely sure what that means, but if it means mostly_nude, then yes you can have both. I kind of disagree with the wiki's definition.

If there is multiple articles of clothing being worn, the only tags do not qualify.

panties and other underwear being worn do not qualify as mostly nude.

I concur with that sentiment. From my point of view, the [clothing]_only tags should be limited to that singular clothing item being worn. Most other cases with a character wearing one or multiple clothing items (but aren't wearing a full set of clothes) would fall under topless, bottomless, or mostly_nude. I also concur that [clothing]_only tags are still applicable if a character also has an accessory, but the associated [accessory]_only tag shouldn't be used in these cases.

However, I'm uncertain about having multiple [accessory]_only tags on a single post, but personally I feel less strict towards this. I think it would be fine to conceivably have collar_only/eyewear_only/necklace_only each tagged on the same post if the character were wearing each of those accessories, but that could just be me. If not, then the [accessory]_only wikis should probably be edited to reflect this.

Apart from that, here's my take on those specific examples:

• For post #2297159, I think it should be tagged with stockings_only, but shouldn't have the glasses_only tag.
• For post #2292486, I think it should be tagged with mostly_nude, but none of the *_only tags.
• For post #2271439, I think it should be tagged with topless, but none of the *_only tags nor the mostly_nude tag.

Fixed the glasses_only wiki. There might be similar mistakes in other *_only tags, I didn't have time to go through all of them.

As for the accessories, it might be worthwhile to make some new tag for those. accessories_only maybe, for posts where a character is wearing a combo of accessories but no clothing. Though that might get mistagged a lot, users have different ideas about exactly what counts as accessory.