Topic: New tag revisement "show_accurate"

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

Link

Found tag and base on its name added somes post which the style is close enough to it source media it can be mistaken as being a part in it. So it pass the 50 post mark which can indicate it may be used more often after some time has passed. Hence if there should be any additional criteria or inclusions to discuss before that bridge is crossed, should be nailed out around this time.

Me, my thought it should be a a little more open. I mean not everything going to be exact. there may be more shading or special effect since it is a still image which can merit more creativity. Not to mention introducing OC into the equation and what they entrails.

supermarcopolo said:
Found tag and base on its name added somes post which the style is close enough to it source media it can be mistaken as being a part in it.

show_accurate

sounds a little constricting, since things don't have to be from a show. There can be comics, games, or simply official artwork. Either way, it sounds like the same thing as on_model, which are characters "stylistically nigh indistinguishable from the original source material". Perhaps it should just be an alias?

Genjar

Former Staff

This is redundant with on_model-- Edit: Ninja'd.

Alias seems like a good idea.

watsit said:
show_accurate sounds a little constricting, since things don't have to be from a show. There can be comics, games, or simply official artwork. Either way, it sounds like the same thing as on_model, which are characters "stylistically nigh indistinguishable from the original source material". Perhaps it should just be an alias?

Yes. think that should be aliases then. Good to know. I find it interesting in a way, we might already a tag but the official naming scheme itself it little obscure for some users (me included). Though in hindsight probably should just check with "is there a tag for that first" in those cases.

  • 1