Implication: on_back -> lying

I mean is it possible to be on your back without lying? It certainly doesn't seem that way on e621.net at least.

https://e621.net/post?tags=on_back

Any other "position" tags that we'd want to implicate to "lying"?

People are dishonest on their backs?

Hammie said:
People are dishonest on their backs?

I heard of people talking at the back of someone, but this is ridiculous!

--On topic--
Is it related to this?

Why don't we alias lying to lying_down while we're at it.

Xch3l said:
I heard of people talking at the back of someone, but this is ridiculous!

--On topic--
Is it related to this?

Oh, actually I didn't see that topic before. :x

Yeah it kind of looks like the laying/lying tags need to be cleaned up and organized a bit.

Here's all the aliases for "lying": http://e621.net/tag_alias?query=lying&user=&approved=all&order=tag

There are currently no implications for "lying".

If we're saying that "lying_on_back", "lying_on_front", and "lying_on_side" are equivalent to "on_back", "on_front", and "on_side" respectively, then I think we should make an implication between those "on" tags and "lying".