The tag implication #33737 black_jeans -> jeans has been approved.

Reason: Missing color tag implication

EDIT: The tag implication black_jeans -> jeans (forum #295717) has been approved by @Millcore.

Hmm... I think black_jeans must be aliased instead, as with the case of blue_jeans...

monsterbomb10010 said:
Hmm... I think black_jeans must be aliased instead, as with the case of blue_jeans...

We could unalias blue_jeans instead.

The bulk update request #247 is active.

remove alias blue_jeans (1661) -> jeans (23234)
create implication black_jeans (399) -> black_pants (10589)

Reason: In case the black_jeans -> jeans implication is approved, blue_jeans must be unaliased, then implicated to jeans...

EDIT: The bulk update request #247 (forum #295723) has been approved by @Millcore.

The tag implication black_jeans -> jeans (forum #295717) has been approved by @Millcore.

The bulk update request #247 (forum #295723) has been approved by @Millcore.

The bulk update request #252 is active.

create implication blue_jeans (1661) -> jeans (23234)
create implication blue_jeans (1661) -> blue_pants (8053)
create implication jeans (23234) -> denim_clothing (32868)
create alias denim_pants (0) -> jeans (23234)

Reason: Alright... as I mentioned at the above BUR, and because it is approved, it's now time to implicate it to jeans...

Edit:

• Just discovered the denim tags... I don't know if it's a good idea to implicate pants to denim_clothing, or to alias denim_pants to the former. I don't want to mess around on others' tag stuff again without permission.

EDIT: The bulk update request #252 (forum #295954) has been approved by @Millcore.

The bulk update request #252 (forum #295954) has been approved by @Millcore.