The bulk update request #606 is active.

mass update sleeping_beauty -> sleeping_beauty_(1959)
mass update princess_aurora -> princess_aurora_(disney)
mass update prince_phillip -> prince_phillip_(disney)
remove alias aurora_(disney) (0) -> princess_aurora (0)
remove implication sleeping_beauty (0) -> disney (134316)
remove implication aurora_(disney) (0) -> disney (134316)
remove implication maleficent (322) -> disney (134316)
create implication sleeping_beauty_(1959) (372) -> disney (134316)
create implication princess_aurora_(disney) (48) -> sleeping_beauty_(1959) (372)
create implication prince_phillip_(disney) (54) -> sleeping_beauty_(1959) (372)
create implication maleficent (322) -> sleeping_beauty_(1959) (372)
create implication fauna_(disney) (3) -> sleeping_beauty_(1959) (372)
create implication flora_(disney) (8) -> sleeping_beauty_(1959) (372)
create implication merryweather_(disney) (3) -> sleeping_beauty_(1959) (372)

Reason: See topic #28359

Yes, aurora_(disney) is aliased to princess_aurora and implicated to disney at the same time. How did this happen?

To do:

alias aurora_(disney) -> princess_aurora_(disney)

EDIT: The bulk update request #606 (forum #303287) has been approved by @Millcore.

gattonero2001 said:
Yes, aurora_(disney) is aliased to princess_aurora and implicated to disney at the same time. How did this happen?

https://e621.net/tag_aliases/13455 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
The implication was supposed to be moved to princess_aurora... but that did not happen for some reason

The bulk update request #606 (forum #303287) has been approved by @Millcore.