The bulk update request #635 has been rejected.

create alias no_pants (0) -> bottomless (151535)
create alias pantsless (3991) -> bottomless (151535)
create alias no_bottoms (0) -> bottomless (151535)

Reason: Pantsless and no_bottoms have no posts and no_pants has only one (and a wiki page somehow), but I feel like this one was a no-brainer. I am curious to see what kind of exception there is if this gets rejected though

EDIT: The bulk update request #635 (forum #303822) has been rejected by @spoopticity.

spoopticity said:
The bulk update request #635 has been rejected.

create alias no_pants (0) -> bottomless (151535)
create alias pantsless (3991) -> bottomless (151535)
create alias no_bottoms (0) -> bottomless (151535)

Reason: Pantsless and no_bottoms have no posts and no_pants has only one (and a wiki page somehow), but I feel like this one was a no-brainer. I am curious to see what kind of exception there is if this gets rejected though

The reason pantsless has no posts and no_pants only has one, is because they were just recently de-aliased from bottomless. The reason that happened, is because running around in boxers is pantsless/etc., but not bottomless. I will admit that "no_bottoms" being aliased sounds fair, though.

Wearing underwear, socks, or stockings is pantsless, but not bottomless.
post #2569173

Or wearing skirts and kilts. Both are pantsless, but neither is bottomless.

spoopticity said:
I am curious to see what kind of exception there is if this gets rejected though

Does this answer your question?

jacob said:
The reason pantsless has no posts and no_pants only has one, is because they were just recently de-aliased from bottomless. The reason that happened, is because running around in boxers is pantsless/etc., but not bottomless. I will admit that "no_bottoms" being aliased sounds fair, though.

Alright yeah, that makes sense.

watsit said:
Wearing underwear, socks, or stockings is pantsless, but not bottomless.
post #2569173

I've looked at the tag wiki, and socks and stockings aren't considered "bottoms", but your point about my error still stands with underwear.

The bulk update request #635 (forum #303822) has been rejected by @spoopticity.