The bulk update request #697 is active.

create alias bunny_teeth (0) -> buckteeth (51378)
create alias rabbit_teeth (0) -> buckteeth (51378)
create alias hare_teeth (0) -> buckteeth (51378)
create alias tobicake (6) -> chocomintshake (91)
remove alias hyper_diaper (63) -> big_diaper (2145)
remove alias thick_diaper (0) -> diaper (24979)
create alias large_diaper (5) -> big_diaper (2145)
create alias giant_diaper (0) -> huge_diaper (516)
create implication huge_diaper (516) -> diaper (24979)

Reason: As for the buckteeth related tags, I've seen an few of them on posts and figured it would be better if they were grouped all together, since they mean the same thing.

As for ChocoMintShake and Tobicake, they're the same person, but they haven't even posted on their FurAffinity in a long time, so going I'm aliasing Tobicake with ChocoMintShake.

As for diaper-related tags, hyper obviously implies being much larger than just "big". Also I'm planning to write a few wikis for them soon.

(Also BTW, for some reason I can't alias shaw_(rouwrf) to shah_(rouwrf), can somebody on the staff do it for me? One more thing too, can't unalias thick_diaper from diaper and re-alias to big_diaper, maybe you can't alias and unalias at the same time?)

EDIT: The bulk update request #697 (forum #305325) has been approved by @slyroon.

The very last one needs to be flipped: diaper -> huge_diaper would make all posts tagged diaper also get tagged huge_diaper, even if a huge diaper is not present.

These might have worked better as three separate requests.
Although, I think there's an error in the last part. You are trying to have diaper imply huge_diaper - it should be the other way around.

decoyjackal said: Also BTW, for some reason I can't alias shaw_(rouwrf) to shah_(rouwrf), can somebody on the staff do it for me?

You can't alias those because of this: https://e621.net/tag_aliases/50886
I presume that the thread is hidden, but the alias is still pending.

decoyjackal said: One more thing too, can't unalias thick_diaper from diaper and re-alias to big_diaper, maybe you can't alias and unalias at the same time?

Indeed, you can't do that in one request. This will need a part two.

siral_exan said:
The very last one needs to be flipped: diaper -> huge_diaper would make all posts tagged diaper also get tagged huge_diaper, even if a huge diaper is not present.

Ah thank you telling me that, I'm still new to the aliasing and implying tags thing.

bitwolfy said:
These might have worked better as three separate requests.
Although, I think there's an error in the last part. You are trying to have diaper imply huge_diaper - it should be the other way around.

You can't alias those because of this: https://e621.net/tag_aliases/50886
I presume that the thread is hidden, but the alias is still pending.

Indeed, you can't do that in one request. This will need a part two.

So that pretty much conforms my suspicions, guess I'll do another once this is accepted. Also yes, I meant to do the diaper and huge_diaper tags the other way around.

I thought that lumping all of it together would be the best idea, I'm starting to regret that now.

decoyjackal said: Ah thank you telling me that, I'm still new to the aliasing and implying tags thing.

decoyjackal said: Also yes, I meant to do the diaper and huge_diaper tags the other way around.

In case it wasn't clear, that was a suggestion for you to go and fix the BUR.
Go here: https://e621.net/bulk_update_requests/697 and click "Edit".

bitwolfy said:
In case it wasn't clear, that was a suggestion for you to go and fix the BUR.

Huh, I don't even know that you can edit BURs, uhh- thanks for telling me existence of that!

decoyjackal said:
Huh, I don't even know that you can edit BURs, uhh- thanks for telling me existence of that!

Yep, it's the only type of request that can be edited.
Which immediately makes is infinitely superior to normal alias/implication requests.

The bulk update request #3670 has been rejected.

create alias hare_teeth (0) -> buckteeth (51378)
create alias tobicake (6) -> chocomintshake (91)
remove alias hyper_diaper (63) -> big_diaper (2145)
remove alias thick_diaper (0) -> diaper (24979)
create alias large_diaper (5) -> big_diaper (2145)
create alias giant_diaper (0) -> huge_diaper (516)
create implication huge_diaper (516) -> big_diaper (2145)

Reason: Fixing this BUR, because the OP hasn't been active in a year.

I checked the artist alias, and it looks fine to me.

- Removed changes that have already been handled.
- Changed huge_diaper to imply big_diaper instead as that is how we handle size differences.

EDIT: The bulk update request #3670 (forum #351717) has failed: Alias for hyper_diaper not found

EDIT: The bulk update request #3670 (forum #351717) has been rejected by @slyroon.

thevileone said:
The bulk update request #3670 has been rejected.

create alias hare_teeth (0) -> buckteeth (51378)
create alias tobicake (6) -> chocomintshake (91)
remove alias hyper_diaper (63) -> big_diaper (2145)
remove alias thick_diaper (0) -> diaper (24979)
create alias large_diaper (5) -> big_diaper (2145)
create alias giant_diaper (0) -> huge_diaper (516)
create implication huge_diaper (516) -> big_diaper (2145)

Reason: Fixing this BUR, because the OP hasn't been active in a year.

I checked the artist alias, and it looks fine to me.

- Removed changes that have already been handled.
- Changed huge_diaper to imply big_diaper instead as that is how we handle size differences.

Bump, it's currently still a tad annoying to work with diaper size tags.
And tobicake is indeed the artist chocomintshake.

https://www.furaffinity.net/user/tobicake/
https://twitter.com/ChocoMintShake

FA has no recent uploads but has recent favs. Twitter has recent uploads.
FA also redirects to the twitter link.
----
Also, I'd like to mention BUR #2326 which also requests to remove alias hyper_diaper -> diaper, plus a few other diaper tags.

The bulk update request #697 (forum #305325) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #3670 (forum #351717) has failed: Alias for hyper_diaper not found

The bulk update request #3670 (forum #351717) has been rejected by @slyroon.