Topic: [REJECTED] Tag alias: white_public_hair -> white_pubes

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

bitwolfy said:
It seems like the tag was literally never used.
Which seems impossible, but here we are anyways.

I think we'll be okay without this alias for the time being.

That's because the change history sucks for anything older than a few months ago. I managed to find the two posts in question by going to OP's change history and filtering for white_pubes:

https://e621.net/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=7759
https://e621.net/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=2550110

EDIT: Which reveals that this alias was itself a typo, and they meant to type white_pubic_hair. Which has allegedly been used six times, although I stand by what I said about the change history routinely forgetting things over a certain age.

wat8548 said:
That's because the change history sucks for anything older than a few months ago. I managed to find the two posts in question by going to OP's change history and filtering for white_pubes:

https://e621.net/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=7759
https://e621.net/post_versions?search%5Bpost_id%5D=2550110

EDIT: Which reveals that this alias was itself a typo, and they meant to type white_pubic_hair. Which has allegedly been used six times, although I stand by what I said about the change history routinely forgetting things over a certain age.

How odd.

The bulk update request #1669 is active.

create alias white_public_hair (0) -> white_pubes (1241)

EDIT: The bulk update request #1669 (forum #322060) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Updated by auto moderator

wat8548 said:
...Did you mean to replicate the typo?

No. I just copied the line from the thread header.
Please, excuse me while I throw myself off a cliff.

  • 1