The tag implication #37737 yuki_(evov1) -> evov1 has been rejected.
Reason:
EDIT: The tag implication yuki_(evov1) -> evov1 (forum #306252) has been rejected by @Millcore.
Updated by auto moderator
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #37737 yuki_(evov1) -> evov1 has been rejected.
Reason:
EDIT: The tag implication yuki_(evov1) -> evov1 (forum #306252) has been rejected by @Millcore.
Updated by auto moderator
Please provide a reason. What seems self-evident to you may not be to someone else, and it's a shame your alias and implication requests could net you another negative record when they needn't.
As for this implication, I'm guessing it's because yuki_(evov1) is a character of artist evov1. An understandable implication considering that characters such as ariel_(disney) (for example) are implicated to owner tags like disney. However,disney is a copyright tag whereas evov1 is an artist tag.
We shouldn't implicate an artist's characters to their artist tag. Other artists can draw yuki_(evov1) and their pictures would not be tagged with evov1. In this case, the _(evov1) part of the character tag is sufficient to show ownership, but if not, a note can be put in the character tag's wiki.
Of course, if I didn't correctly guess why you made this implication request, that's why you put in a reason.
this user never puts a reason. no point trying to convince them at this point
strikerman said:
this user never puts a reason. no point trying to convince them at this point
I know, but sometimes you just have to tilt at some windmills for formality's sake.
-1 : Oh... Can't do much about the OP
Now, Do you think we need a feature/rule that
"Reason(s) must be given for making a topic"? [ Prohibit making a topic without saying something about why ]
(( I really thought about making that request... ))
Updated
The tag implication yuki_(evov1) -> evov1 (forum #306252) has been rejected by @Millcore.