The tag implication #38399 oyakodon -> food has been rejected.

Reason: According to the e621 and Wikipedia articles for this, it is part of Japanese cuisine. As such, it inherently is a food and thus deserves the food tag- possibly also a Japan-related tag. There is also a donburi_(food) tag which this could be implicated to as it a donburi-type dish, but that tag has just one image.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oyakodon
https://e621.net/wiki_pages/34586

EDIT: The tag implication oyakodon -> food (forum #307081) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

-1：Yeah you're right, Oyakodon(親子丼) is a common dish in Japan.　And It is one of my favorites.

However, I do have one question.
The 9 posts currently tagged ”Oyakodon” aren't what you might have imagined.
I do Not think there is a oyakodon as a food or donburi_(food) among these.

...So, Isn't that tag literally used to mean "parent-and-child donburi"?　^{((「 親と子の丼ぶり 」, huh...🙄 ? ))}
I think "donburi" means that parent(s) and children(s) are having sex.

Note that, I searched for a post of Oyakodon as food in e6 but not found.

The tag is used figuratively to suggest having sex with a parent and their child. Exactly zero of the posts tagged "oyakodon" feature food. See if there's a better tag, do manual clean-up, and then do the implication if we can actually find any image examples.

kurogi_foxsiv said:
-1：Yeah you're right, Oyakodon(親子丼) is a common dish in Japan.　And It is one of my favorites.

However, I do have one question.
The 9 posts currently tagged ”Oyakodon” aren't what you might have imagined.
I do Not think there is a oyakodon as a food or donburi_(food) among these.

...So, Isn't that tag literally used to mean "parent-and-child donburi"?　^{((「 親と子の丼ぶり 」, huh...🙄 ? ))}
I think "donburi" means that parent(s) and children(s) are having sex.

Note that, I searched for a post of Oyakodon as food in e6 but not found.

Looks like they were mostly tagged by this person which means it's just somebody not knowing what a word meant and using it anyways. He should have been using parent_and_child instead.

The implication won't really have any use while there's no images tagged properly, but it will help people realize something was wrong with their tagging if it does go through.

furrin_gok said:
Looks like they were (...)

+1：Then I'm going to upvote this, as this tag no longer has a post.
If I can find a proper image for this tag, I'll tag it.　I still haven't found it, though.

...Well, Or maybe that will be the next image I draw.

Rejected for now.
If an actual food item does end up tagged, we'll come back to this.

The tag implication oyakodon -> food (forum #307081) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.