Topic: Should I tag Different Circumcision styles?

Posted under Tag/Wiki Projects and Questions

Or is that considered too minute in terms of tag speciation?

Bc theres a lot of physical appearance difference between a low tight cut and a high loose cut. A high loose cut can even be left with so much that it looks almost uncut whereas low tight can be so drum raw that its unmistakeable. Not to mention the ablation of the sulcus and frenulum.

And if weve started tagging sulcus. Should I tag as a project each type of cut on tbe circumcised tag? Or do yall not give a fuck

Sorry to bump this but I dont wanna be Armpit guy, tagging every relevant detail only to have the minutia be considered irrelevant and invalidated.

I'd say keep it simple, I really don't believe the general userbase knows or cares enough about this to make it a complex mess.

If we're thinking of the same "armpit guy", they restrict themselves to tagging exactly one thing (it's kinda their whole gimmick) and as far as I know it's never been disputed.

At the end of the day, you're free to tag anything within the bounds of TWYS. Just don't expect any help for projects which are both high effort and of niche interest.

  • 1