The tag implication #38425 undressing_partner -> assisted_exposure has been rejected.

Reason: Undressing your partner is basically assisted exposure

EDIT: The tag implication undressing_partner -> assisted_exposure (forum #307519) has been rejected by @Millcore.

You can undress your partner without actually exposing them, for example if you take off their jacket but they still have an undershirt.

faucet said:
You can undress your partner without actually exposing them, for example if you take off their jacket but they still have an undershirt.

The current wiki for assisted exposure says:

Used to describe when a character is being undressed by anyone or anything other than themselves.

In a way, this makes sense, as exposure doesn't haven't to refer to someone's bits being on display. Pantsing implies assisted_exposure, even though the character could still be wearing underclothes preventing any lewd display. Their under-layers are still being exposed. If you take off someone's jacket in the middle of a blizzard or rainstorm, they'd be exposed to the elements, even if they still have an undershirt still on.

Though I'm not sure if it'd worth the tag carrying that technicality, compared to the most common use-case of it being to show off someone's underwear or breasts/genitals, and instead use a different tag for the more general removal of garments.

faucet said:
You can undress your partner without actually exposing them, for example if you take off their jacket but they still have an undershirt.

Thinking the same. You can take off a jacket or sweater and still have more layers under that.

The tag implication undressing_partner -> assisted_exposure (forum #307519) has been rejected by @Millcore.

The bulk update request #6822 is pending approval.

create alias undressing_partner (718) -> assisted_exposure (7430)
create alias undressing_another (1457) -> assisted_exposure (7430)

Reason: The tags are effectively identical, the technicalities don't justify its existence