Implicating egg_vibrator → vibrator
Link to implication

Reason:

Vibrating_egg was implicated, but this one never got implicated.

parasprite said:
Vibrating_egg was implicated, but this one never got implicated.

I've never heard of a vibrating_egg. I would have thought the name would be egg_vibrator, and looking into it, it does get aliased. So +1.

how about aliasing egg_vibrator and vibrating_egg for consistency?

Yyunko said:
how about aliasing egg_vibrator and vibrating_egg for consistency?

They are actually already aliased. It looks like vibrating_egg was the older term and for some reason they got aliased together (vibrating_egg actually already implies vibrator).

parasprite said:
They are actually already aliased. It looks like vibrating_egg was the older term and for some reason they got aliased together (vibrating_egg actually already implies vibrator).

ok, althoug I'm wondering, normally if they are aliased, and I tag "egg_vibrator" woulndt it be replaced by 'vibrating_egg" and add "vibrator"?

Yyunko said:
ok, althoug I'm wondering, normally if they are aliased, and I tag "egg_vibrator" woulndt it be replaced by 'vibrating_egg" and add "vibrator"?

Never thought about it actually. Just tested it and nope, it gets moved before any implications are made.

parasprite said:
Never thought about it actually. Just tested it and nope, it gets moved before any implications are made.

ok thanks ^^"
+1 for your implication then.