The bulk update request #853 is active.

create alias improvised_anal_bead (0) -> improvised_anal_beads (3)
create alias improvised_analbead (0) -> improvised_anal_beads (3)
create alias improvised_analbeads (0) -> improvised_anal_beads (3)
create alias improvised_butt_plug (0) -> improvised_buttplug (61)
create implication improvised_anal_beads (3) -> improvised_sex_toy (8705)
create implication improvised_buttplug (61) -> improvised_sex_toy (8705)
create implication improvised_vibrator (140) -> improvised_sex_toy (8705)

Reason: Some aliases/implications for tags related to improvised_sex_toy.

• Important question! Should improvised_sex_toy imply sex_toy (as well as implying all the other improvised_[toy] tags to their respective [toy])?

EDIT: The bulk update request #853 (forum #308779) has been approved by @Millcore.

d.d.m. said:

• Important question! Should improvised_sex_toy imply sex_toy (as well as implying all the other improvised_[toy] tags to their respective [toy])?

I don't think so, imo the whole point of an improvised sex toy is that it's not supposed to be a real sex toy and rather something like a carrot or a traffic cone. I don't think these things, despite how they're being used, should actually be tagged as sex_toy.

+1 to everything else in the BUR though

d.d.m. said:
Important question! Should improvised_sex_toy imply sex_toy (as well as implying all the other improvised_[toy] tags to their respective [toy])?

I feel that improvised_sex_toy should stay separate from sex_toy.
If a dragon decides to use a car or a subway train as an improvised fleshlight, it doesn't make it a sex_toy per se.

I guess it's a good thing I removed those implications from the BUR before submitting it, and added that question instead. Thank y'all for your input!

The bulk update request #853 (forum #308779) has been approved by @Millcore.