The tag alias #51790 dominatrix -> dominant_female has been rejected.

Reason:

EDIT: The tag alias dominatrix -> dominant_female (forum #310743) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Make sure you list your reasons.
post #2742899 post #2643118 post #2579164
There are a lot of images under dominatrix intersex, and some of male characters who may or may not be girly.
post #1756480 post #1765314
Some of them don't even look particularly dominative, and sometimes don't even include a submissive partner to suggest a dominant partner either.

furrin_gok said:
There are a lot of images under dominatrix intersex, and some of male characters who may or may not be girly.

The wiki explicitly states:

dominatrix says:
A female who practices BDSM in the dominating role

Should this be rewritten to include generally feminine characters (herms, gynomorphs, girly males)? What about maleherms and andromorphs which don't look overly masculine? That calls to question the point of the tag, if it's that close to just referring to a general dom. Otherwise, I'd say those examples (except post #1765314, which looks female) are mistags.

watsit said:
The wiki explicitly states:
Should this be rewritten to include generally feminine characters (herms, gynomorphs, girly males)? What about maleherms and andromorphs which don't look overly masculine? That calls to question the point of the tag, if it's that close to just referring to a general dom. Otherwise, I'd say those examples (except post #1765314, which looks female) are mistags.

We either need to clean this out before aliasing, or to rewrite the wiki. I have a slight preference towards rewriting it to include other characters, but at least the ones where they aren't displaying themselves as dominant should not be tagged. I wouldn't mind too terribly if it went the opposite direction either, and we just cleaned out anything that isn't female, but either way some cleaning is needed before an alias or implication goes through.

The tag alias dominatrix -> dominant_female (forum #310743) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.