For about two days now I've been going through the vore tags, iinspecting each one. And if I feel confident in it. Tagging them as either fatal or endosoma,and willing or unwilling, as those are the largest differentiators that people who are into that tend to look for.

I've recently accepted that as it is. This is far to large a project for me to tackle on my own.

I just want to be able to whitelist logical vore, like a lizard or fly trap eating an insect.

For all the work you are doing, I present you with the title of "Professional Vore Inspector"

Congratulations!

furrin_gok said:
I just want to be able to whitelist logical vore, like a lizard or fly trap eating an insect.

I think vore rating:s should be the search for that. In my opinion, vore should always be rated at LEAST questionable if it was drawn for fetish purposes.

abstractedtown said:
I think vore rating:s should be the search for that. In my opinion, vore should always be rated at LEAST questionable if it was drawn for fetish purposes.

furrin_gok said:
I just want to be able to whitelist logical vore, like a lizard or fly trap eating an insect.

Like, the sort of thing that isn't out of the question in real life?
I was going to sudgest "realistic vore" but realized that that is already a term for something else

Since this is really at least a month long project. I've decided to add another order of business to the agenda. Most oral vore isn't actually tagged as oral_vore. Just as regular vore. So I'm adding that as well now

abstractedtown said:
I think vore rating:s should be the search for that.

If that same kind of eating has a character with their junk out, or enough blood on display, it wouldn't be SFW despite being "logical vore".