The tag implication #40199 cervix_kiss -> cervical_contact has been rejected.

Reason: Redundant naming conventions, they are honestly one in the same

EDIT: The tag implication cervix_kiss -> cervical_contact (forum #311545) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Not sure if you meant to alias them both together, but I think it would work better as an implication.
Since cervix_kiss is used when the penis touches the cervix, cervical_contact can be used for anything (dildo, inanimate objects, etc.) touching the cervix.

thegreatwolfgang said:
Since cervix_kiss is used when the penis touches the cervix, cervical_contact can be used for anything (dildo, inanimate objects, etc.) touching the cervix.

Makes sense to me. Kiss would be the penis bumping it, while contact is everything bumping it.

furrin_gok said:
Makes sense to me. Kiss would be the penis bumping it, while contact is everything bumping it.

Having separate cervical contact tags for penis and everything else makes sense to me.
However, as I said in the other thread, the name cervix_kiss does not seem too intuitive to me. If anything, it evokes some rather... anatomically improbable images of someone planting an actual kiss on the cervix.

Maybe, a different name would work better?

bitwolfy said:
Having separate cervical contact tags for penis and everything else makes sense to me.
However, as I said in the other thread, the name cervix_kiss does not seem too intuitive to me. If anything, it evokes some rather... anatomically improbable images of someone planting an actual kiss on the cervix.

Maybe, a different name would work better?

I think the term originated from images that depicted the cervix and urethral slit of the penis as kissy lips as they came into contact with one another. Even outside of that, it's still two tight openings bumping together, just like puckered lips.

furrin_gok said:
I think the term originated from images that depicted the cervix and urethral slit of the penis as kissy lips as they came into contact with one another. Even outside of that, it's still two tight openings bumping together, just like puckered lips.

Plus we could use the cunnilingus tag for the literal kissing of the cervix should that need ever rise

The tag implication cervix_kiss -> cervical_contact (forum #311545) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.