The bulk update request #1003 is pending approval.

create alias hidden_buxom (97) -> hidden_big_breasts (0)

Reason: more straightforward of a tag name. also couldn't find a suitable penis equivalent of "buxom".

Shouldn't this be an alias instead?

should it? i thought mass update was for changing the title of a tag. should it be an alias if that's what i'm trying to do?

garfieldfromgarfield said:
should it? i thought mass update was for changing the title of a tag. should it be an alias if that's what i'm trying to do?

Yes. Alias will permanently change a tag, an update is for cases where you cleaned out, say a disambiguation tag, and only one definition remains. The tag can continue to be used in the future, it's only getting changed the one time.
Worth pointing out though: You can edit your own BURs to replace the update with alias.

furrin_gok said:
Yes. Alias will permanently change a tag, an update is for cases where you cleaned out, say a disambiguation tag, and only one definition remains. The tag can continue to be used in the future, it's only getting changed the one time.
Worth pointing out though: You can edit your own BURs to replace the update with alias.

ok thank you very much. i'm still very much a newbie when it comes to doing anything on this site lmao

there. just fixed it.

I think you can include an implication of hidden_large_breasts with hammerspace into the BUR.

Also, I have concerns over whether the following can be considered hidden_large_breasts since it did show the transition within a single post:
post #2652982/post #2652983 and post #2233461/post #2233462

garfieldfromgarfield said:

The bulk update request #1003 is pending approval.

create alias hidden_buxom (97) -> hidden_big_breasts (0)

Reason: more straightforward of a tag name. also couldn't find a suitable penis equivalent of "buxom".

I'm wondering if aliasing hidden_buxom -> hidden_big_breasts would be better (since large_breasts is aliased to big_breasts). If you want to start a new variant of this tag for penis, maybe hidden_big_penis would be a good option?

thegreatwolfgang said:

I think you can include an implication of hidden_large_breasts with hammerspace into the BUR.

Also, I have concerns over whether the following can be considered hidden_large_breasts since it did show the transition within a single post:
post #2652982/post #2652983 and post #2233461/post #2233462

I think those examples could definitely count, but (if they do count) the hidden_large_breasts/hidden_big_breasts tag shouldn't imply breasts (since breasts may not be present within the post). I definitely think hidden_larger_breasts/hidden_big_breasts (and hidden_big_penis?) should imply hammerspace as well.

With few exceptions, tags should be evident from the post itself not others related to it. I don't think this tag can be correctly applied to many of the posts it's on now like post #2233312. I think this concept would be more appropriate as a set.

is there a way to tag sets? or are you just suggesting to remove the tag from a few posts?

d.d.m. said:
I think those examples could definitely count, but (if they do count) the hidden_large_breasts/hidden_big_breasts tag shouldn't imply breasts (since breasts may not be present within the post). I definitely think hidden_larger_breasts/hidden_big_breasts (and hidden_big_penis?) should imply hammerspace as well.

Hmm, if it did count, my concern now is that as hidden_big_breasts implies hammerspace, it may or may not be shown in within a single post as well.

thegreatwolfgang said:
Hmm, if it did count, my concern now is that as hidden_big_breasts implies hammerspace, it may or may not be shown in within a single post as well.

i thought about that too. i don't think that hidden_big_breasts should imply hammerspace simply because it may be some situation that doesn't involve hammerspace at all.

I'm suggesting removing the tag from posts that don't show the flat chest and the large breasts both. When hidden buxom is evident from multiple posts together, you instead can put these posts in a set called hidden buxom.