The tag implication #40280 cherry_coke -> coca-cola has been rejected.

Reason: Cherry flavored Coke

EDIT: The tag implication cherry_coke -> coca-cola (forum #313815) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

cringebird said:
The tag implication #40280 cherry_coke -> coca-cola has been rejected.

Reason: Cherry flavored Coke

Gonna point out the one (1) post tagged cherry_coke does not contain Cherry Coke, or any Coca-Cola branding

Is it necessary to have separate tags for diet <softdrink brand>, cherry <softdrink brand>, and whatever other style a given softdrink brand may try to market?

kemonophonic said:
We need a caffeine_free_diet_coke tag.

votp said:
coca-cola_garlic

takkola, actually

The bulk update request #1337 is pending approval.

create implication Coca-Cola® with Coffee Dark Blend Zero Sugar -> Coca-Cola® with Coffee Dark Blend
create implication Coca-Cola® with Coffee Dark Blend -> Coca-Cola® with Coffee
create implication Coca-Cola® with Coffee -> Coca-Cola®
create implication Coca-Cola® with Coffee -> Coffee

Reason: https://us.coca-cola.com/products/coke-with-coffee/dark-blend-zero-sugar

You might want to at least get rid of those registered trademark symbols. They're unnecessary for tagging purposes at the very least.

clawstripe said:
You might want to at least get rid of those registered trademark symbols. They're unnecessary for tagging purposes at the very least.

This is not a real bur, probably just wrote it by hand. Consequent tags (the ones after ->) can only contain ascii characters which ® is not. A bur with id 1337 also does not exist yet, which is why you can't click on the id like you normaly would be able to. Burs always lowercase their tags and cannot contain spaces, you're also not able to vote on it.

Well, I thought the trademark symbols would make it funnier. Because, you know, you’re not allowed to use those.

I admit you had me fooled for a minute there. I was scratching my head how you managed to do that. Even tried to make one myself to double check.

scaliespe said:
Well, I thought the trademark symbols would make it funnier. Because, you know, you’re not allowed to use those.

10/10 joke, genuinely

post #1478873

strikerman said:
takkola, actually

I want to drink it.

earlopain said:
This is not a real bur, probably just wrote it by hand. Consequent tags (the ones after ->) can only contain ascii characters which ® is not. A bur with id 1337 also does not exist yet, which is why you can't click on the id like you normaly would be able to. Burs always lowercase their tags and cannot contain spaces, you're also not able to vote on it.

1337. That's a meme I've not heard in a long time. A long time.

scaliespe said:
Well, I thought the trademark symbols would make it funnier. Because, you know, you’re not allowed to use those.

Well, you did fool me, so you were successful. Unfortunately, there's no joke so obvious that someone, somewhere, won't take it seriously and miss the point entirely.

clawstripe said:
Well, you did fool me, so you were successful. Unfortunately, there's no joke so obvious that someone, somewhere, won't take it seriously and miss the point entirely.

we participate in a little bit of tomfoolery

post #2625261

The tag implication cherry_coke -> coca-cola (forum #313815) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Aha! Good memories. :3