The tag implication #41761 pharaohmone -> wildmons_(catcouch) has been rejected.

Reason: Wildmons are Catcouch's OC equivalent of pokemon, of which pharaohmone is one.

EDIT: The tag implication pharaohmone_(catcouch) -> wildmons_(catcouch) (forum #317701) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

We don't imply characters to species, because they can be drawn as an alternate_species. An implication would force the tag into the post, even though pharaohmone might not look like a "wildmon" in every image.

siral_exan said:
We don't imply characters to species, because they can be drawn as an alternate_species. An implication would force the tag into the post, even though pharaohmone might not look like a "wildmon" in every image.

Unless wildmon is the equivelant of the pokemon_(species) tag.

furrin_gok said:
Unless wildmon is the equivelant of the pokemon_(species) tag.

... wouldn't that actually be the same problem? If someone draws Ash's Pikachu as a normal mouse, it's not a pokemon_(species) anymore so tagging pikachu would add that invalid tag.

watsit said:
... wouldn't that actually be the same problem? If someone draws Ash's Pikachu as a normal mouse, it's not a pokemon_(species) anymore so tagging pikachu would add that invalid tag.

That depends on if Pharaohmone is a species like pikachu (and thus needs a category change) or a character. Either way, it should lose the suffix.

The tag implication pharaohmone_(catcouch) -> wildmons_(catcouch) (forum #317701) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.