Topic: [REJECTED] Lore Tag Relationship BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

gattonero2001

Janitor

The bulk update request #1506 has been rejected.

change category grandson_(lore) (651) -> lore
change category granddaughter_(lore) (338) -> lore
change category grandmother_(lore) (802) -> lore
change category grandfather_(lore) (597) -> lore
change category son_(lore) (24446) -> lore
change category daughter_(lore) (15409) -> lore
change category mother_(lore) (28125) -> lore
change category father_(lore) (20418) -> lore
change category brother_(lore) (31108) -> lore
change category sister_(lore) (31152) -> lore
change category uncle_(lore) (1729) -> lore
change category aunt_(lore) (962) -> lore
change category cousin_(lore) (0) -> lore
change category grandparent_and_grandchild_(lore) (931) -> lore
change category grandmother_and_grandson_(lore) (248) -> lore
change category grandmother_and_granddaughter_(lore) (191) -> lore
change category grandmother_and_grandchild_(lore) (425) -> lore
change category grandfather_and_grandson_(lore) (359) -> lore
change category grandfather_and_granddaughter_(lore) (142) -> lore
change category grandfather_and_grandchild_(lore) (498) -> lore
change category parent_and_child_(lore) (38784) -> lore
change category mother_and_son_(lore) (12423) -> lore
change category mother_and_daughter_(lore) (9544) -> lore
change category mother_and_child_(lore) (22131) -> lore
change category father_and_son_(lore) (11517) -> lore
change category father_and_daughter_(lore) (7044) -> lore
change category father_and_child_(lore) (18446) -> lore
create implication grandmother_and_grandson_(lore) (248) -> grandmother_and_grandchild_(lore) (425)
create implication grandmother_and_grandson_(lore) (248) -> grandson_(lore) (651)
create implication grandmother_and_granddaughter_(lore) (191) -> grandmother_and_grandchild_(lore) (425)
create implication grandmother_and_granddaughter_(lore) (191) -> granddaughter_(lore) (338)
create implication grandmother_and_grandchild_(lore) (425) -> grandparent_and_grandchild_(lore) (931)
create implication grandmother_and_grandchild_(lore) (425) -> grandmother_(lore) (802)
create implication grandfather_and_grandson_(lore) (359) -> grandfather_and_grandchild_(lore) (498)
create implication grandfather_and_grandson_(lore) (359) -> grandson_(lore) (651)
create implication grandfather_and_granddaughter_(lore) (142) -> grandfather_and_grandchild_(lore) (498)
create implication grandfather_and_granddaughter_(lore) (142) -> granddaughter_(lore) (338)
create implication grandfather_and_grandchild_(lore) (498) -> grandparent_and_grandchild_(lore) (931)
create implication grandfather_and_grandchild_(lore) (498) -> grandfather_(lore) (597)
create implication mother_and_son_(lore) (12423) -> mother_and_child_(lore) (22131)
create implication mother_and_son_(lore) (12423) -> son_(lore) (24446)
create implication mother_and_daughter_(lore) (9544) -> mother_and_child_(lore) (22131)
create implication mother_and_daughter_(lore) (9544) -> daughter_(lore) (15409)
create implication mother_and_child_(lore) (22131) -> parent_and_child_(lore) (38784)
create implication mother_and_child_(lore) (22131) -> mother_(lore) (28125)
create implication father_and_son_(lore) (11517) -> father_and_child_(lore) (18446)
create implication father_and_son_(lore) (11517) -> son_(lore) (24446)
create implication father_and_daughter_(lore) (7044) -> father_and_child_(lore) (18446)
create implication father_and_daughter_(lore) (7044) -> daughter_(lore) (15409)
create implication father_and_child_(lore) (18446) -> parent_and_child_(lore) (38784)
create implication father_and_child_(lore) (18446) -> father_(lore) (20418)

Reason: All lore tags must have the suffix *_(lore) due to a requirement in e621's code. This BUR aims to recreate existing relationships in other tags that will be moved to the Lore category in the future.

Incomplete, this would be too complicated to do by myself and I gladly welcome any help that is offered.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1506 (forum #319521) has been rejected by @gattonero2001.

Updated by auto moderator

spe

Admin

The bulk update request #1507 has been rejected.

change category accidental_incest_(lore) (224) -> lore
change category forced_incest_(lore) (125) -> lore
change category semi_incest_(lore) (0) -> lore
change category technical_incest_(lore) (0) -> lore
create alias accidental_incest (0) -> accidental_incest_(lore) (224)
create implication accidental_incest_(lore) (224) -> incest_(lore) (52254)
remove implication forced_incest (4) -> forced (95133)
remove implication forced_incest (4) -> incest_(lore) (52254)
create implication forced_incest_(lore) (125) -> forced (95133)
create implication forced_incest_(lore) (125) -> incest_(lore) (52254)
create implication semi_incest_(lore) (0) -> incest_(lore) (52254)
remove alias semi-incest (0) -> semi_incest (7)
create alias technical_incest (0) -> technical_incest_(lore) (0)
create implication technical_incest_(lore) (0) -> incest_(lore) (52254)

Reason: Changing the various incestuous tags into lore tags. I left out twincest and selfcest because those can both be identified according to TWYS. That is, assuming that the twins are identical and not fraternal, which they should be if we are going to keep the twins tag out of the lore category.

Followup BUR:
alias forced_incest -> forced_incest_(lore) alias semi_incest -> semi_incest_(lore) alias semi-incest -> semi_incest_(lore)

EDIT: The bulk update request #1507 (forum #319523) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Updated by auto moderator

  • 1