The bulk update request #1560 is active.

remove implication oreo_(food) (6) -> food (155045)
create alias oreo (2) -> oreo_(disambiguation) (6)
create alias oreo_(food) (6) -> oreo_cookie (110)
create implication oreo_cookie (110) -> cookie (4361)

Reason: oreo is getting used as a name, two different tags for the same use with cookie secondary use making more sense to me, and well a cookie is a cookie.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1560 (forum #320341) has been approved by @slyroon.

You will need to unimply oreo_(food) -> food before you can create alias oreo_(food) -> oreo_cookie.

gattonero2001 said:
You will need to unimply oreo_(food) -> food before you can create alias oreo_(food) -> oreo_cookie.

woops, didn't notice the implication for that. thanks

I believe the alias away needs to occur in a second BUR? It at least gives the appearance of being unavailable while there's still the implication.

furrin_gok said:
I believe the alias away needs to occur in a second BUR? It at least gives the appearance of being unavailable while there's still the implication.

I think that's because it has an implication attached, which makes me want to theorize that because I put the remove implicate at top, it might work? idk.

The bulk update request #6877 has been rejected.

create alias oreo_(food) (6) -> oreo_cookie (110)

Reason: Remove this line from original BUR to avoid it blocking the BUR

Interesting, it didn't block the BUR

The bulk update request #1560 (forum #320341) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6877 (forum #393406) has been rejected by @SNPtheCat.