The tag implication #42923 losttomadness -> earl_of_lemongrab has been rejected.

Reason: Could the Asriel Dreemurr (God Form) tag also imply Asriel Dreemurr? I find it odd that there are posts that tag Asriel's god form but not his base character, since one is just a variant form on the other.

EDIT: The tag implication losttomadness -> lemongrab (forum #324021) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

－１：
First, That tag losttomadness is Not currently being used for anything.　...You must have mistook it for some other tag? 🤔

Second, I'd Not agree with implying God-Form → Asriel either.
Yeah indeed, God-Form Is also Asriel.　But, The problem mentioned in this topic will occur - [ https://e621.net/forum_topics/25211 ]

I Personally think it'd be nice to have a Tag for Asriel's young-form.

The implication page is asking which tags you mean to implicate, not who the user is that's asking to implicate tags.

But that aside, different forms of a character (or species) have separate tags to make it easier to search or blacklist one or the other. If you wanted to find all pictures of Asriel not in his god form, this kind of implication would prevent that. See also how link_(wolf_form) doesn't implicate link, or alolan_ninetales doesn't implicate ninetales.

The tag implication losttomadness -> lemongrab (forum #324021) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.