The bulk update request #1820 is active.

remove implication bolt (0) -> bolt_(film) (730)
mass update bolt -> bolt_(bolt)
create implication bolt_(bolt) (695) -> bolt_(film) (730)
remove alias bolt(character) (0) -> bolt (0)

Reason: Bolt is a rather generic name, how has it sat around like this so long? None of the recent images are falsely tagged currently, but I'm still digging a bit to see if the older images are safe too.

EDIT: The bulk update request #1820 (forum #324157) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

I don't really like bolt_(film_character) as a tag name tbh (what if there's a character named Bolt in another film?), but I'm struggling to think of something better.

...bolt_(film_character) sounds a bit awkward, how about bolt_(bolt)?

gattonero2001 said:
...bolt_(film_character) sounds a bit awkward, how about bolt_(bolt)?

I considered that, but it felt too confusing. If that's just on me alone though, them it's an easy change.

furrin_gok said:
I considered that, but it felt too confusing. If that's just on me alone though, them it's an easy change.

Tags in the CHARACTERNAME_COPYRIGHTNAME format in which CHARACTERNAME and COPYRIGHTNAME are the same word are not that uncommon.

• chikn_nuggit_(chikn_nuggit)

• inuyasha_(inuyasha)

gattonero2001 said:
Tags in the CHARACTERNAME_COPYRIGHTNAME format in which CHARACTERNAME and COPYRIGHTNAME are the same word are not that uncommon.

• chikn_nuggit_(chikn_nuggit)

• inuyasha_(inuyasha)

Fair enough, went ahead and changed it.

gattonero2001 said:
Tags in the CHARACTERNAME_COPYRIGHTNAME format in which CHARACTERNAME and COPYRIGHTNAME are the same word are not that uncommon.

• chikn_nuggit_(chikn_nuggit)

• inuyasha_(inuyasha)

I have trained you well, my son

The bulk update request #1820 (forum #324157) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

Ooh, even a hastily prepared disambiguation page at bolt_(disambiguation). Thanks bitWolf!