The bulk update request #1841 is active.

create alias newark (0) -> kolvackh (0)
create alias newark-a1 (0) -> kolvackh (0)
create alias newark_a1 (0) -> kolvackh (0)

Reason: "Kolvackh" is the artist's current identity, switching from "newark" or "newark-a1".

EDIT: The bulk update request #1841 (forum #324594) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

+1; The newark_a1 Twitter bio says "repurposed for @kolvackh’s scrapbook", which I believe indicates that kolvackh is now the main account.

...This guy should probably be on the DNP list/conditional_dnp or something? Most of his art on this site was taken down: ~newark ~newark_a1 ~newark-a1 status:deleted via takedown #10458. Many of these posts are still up publicly on his twitter/FA, (e.g post #1406827 post #2131516 post #2130692), which means it's not about paywall content. Also, some of the current posts were taken down previously: e.g. post #2325074 is a duplicate of post #2250551. Except the guy in the comments on that post says "newark was DNP, but now isn't"? This is a little concerning.

Edit: I did a more thorough check and it seems like those two posts are slightly different. None of the current posts share sources with the deleted posts.

matrixmash said:
...This guy should probably be on the DNP list/conditional_dnp or something? Most of his art on this site was taken down: ~newark ~newark_a1 ~newark-a1 status:deleted via takedown #10458. Many of these posts are still up publicly on his twitter/FA, (e.g post #1406827 post #2131516 post #2130692), which means it's not about paywall content. Also, some of the current posts were taken down previously: e.g. post #2325074 is a duplicate of post #2250551. Except the guy in the comments on that post says "newark was DNP, but now isn't"? This is a little concerning.

An artist has to ask to be made DNP to be put on the list. A mass takedown doesn't count even if that's effectively what they're doing.

The bulk update request #1841 (forum #324594) has been approved by @bitWolfy.