The bulk update request #1978 is active.

remove implication double_chin (1943) -> dewlap_(anatomy) (2093)

Reason: A double chin is a roll or rolls of fat under the chin, a dewlap is loose skin hanging off of the chin/neck found on lizards and some bird species, while a rabbit dewlap is closer to a double chin, it's a distinct ring of fat, covered in thick fur, around the entire neck, outside of extremely morbidly obese characters (actually, like the example image given in the article), they're not visually similar. It doesn't make much sense to have a more common (if undertagged) humanoid feature implicate a somewhat niche animal trait?

EDIT: The bulk update request #1978 (forum #326614) has been approved by @bitWolfy.

bumped

Looks like that implication was made a couple of years ago with no discussion. Guess some of those through-the-cracks implications are still sitting around from back then.

furrin_gok said:
Looks like that implication was made a couple of years ago with no discussion. Guess some of those through-the-cracks implications are still sitting around from back then.

I don't get why it would have been approved at all, they're clearly different things.

hungrymaple said:
I don't get why it would have been approved at all, they're clearly different things.

Dice was an extremely active alias/implication admin, they were very entuned to anatomy and species so it could of been an interpretation thing. I miss Dice.

Moose also have a dewlap. A loose flap of skin is not the same as a roll of fat

The bulk update request #1978 (forum #326614) has been approved by @bitWolfy.