The tag implication #43486 freya_vix -> wildmons_(catcouch) has been rejected.

Reason: Freya Vix is one of Catcouch's Wildmons.

EDIT: The tag implication freya_vix -> wildmons_(catcouch) (forum #327730) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

We don't implicate characters to species due to possible alternate_species situations.

Looking into it, Freya Vix is a Royal Vixult, a variant of vixult. Even if we did implicate characters, we keep forms separate, so "Royal Vixult" would not imply "Vixult".

…what’s the purpose of wildmons_(catcouch), exactly? It looks like it’s being used for more than one species.

scaliespe said:
…what’s the purpose of wildmons_(catcouch), exactly? It looks like it’s being used for more than one species.

I suppose it's being used as a pokémon_(species) type of tag... but without a species suffix shouldn't it be a copyright tag? If it were a copyright, the implication could fit.

furrin_gok said:
I suppose it's being used as a pokémon_(species) type of tag... but without a species suffix shouldn't it be a copyright tag? If it were a copyright, the implication could fit.

This is what I would assume, personally, but I know nothing about wildmons or where it’s from, so I can’t comment on whether or not that’s accurate.

I know very little about this as well. But having it as a copyright tag seems alright, since "Wildmons" is supposed to be the name of the project as a whole (see topic #29311).