The tag implication #43574 sina_(pokemon) -> pokemon has been approved.

Reason: Sina is a character from the Pokémon games

EDIT: The tag implication sina_(pokemon) -> pokemon (forum #328939) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

Should probably be aliased to sina_(pokémon) (which itself would imply pokémon), to keep the suffix consistent with other characters.

watsit said:
Should probably be aliased to sina_(pokémon) (which itself would imply pokémon), to keep the suffix consistent with other characters.

I still hate the special character because it stops wildcard searches from working. *pokemon* isn't the same as *pokémon*.

furrin_gok said:
I still hate the special character because it stops wildcard searches from working. *pokemon* isn't the same as *pokémon*.

the aliases don't apply to wildcards?

versperus said:
the aliases don't apply to wildcards?

On post searches, maybe, but not on tag searches

versperus said:
the aliases don't apply to wildcards?

They do not. Practically every result under *pokemon* has pokemon_unite, pokemon_legends_arceus, rei_(pokemon), etc.

lafcadio said:
They do not. Practically every result under *pokemon* has pokemon_unite, pokemon_legends_arceus, rei_(pokemon), etc.

Oh well there you go, it doesn't even on normal searches. Thanks for confirming that, I thought I was misremembering.

The tag implication sina_(pokemon) -> pokemon (forum #328939) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #3885 is active.

create alias sina_(pokémon) (0) -> sina_(pokemon) (21)

Reason: Alias the tag that's actually in use to the tag that has the implication

EDIT: The bulk update request #3885 (forum #354351) has been approved by @gattonero2001.

The bulk update request #3885 (forum #354351) has been approved by @gattonero2001.