The tag implication #43576 gentle_femdom -> dominant_female is pending approval.

Reason: Gentle femdom is a subcategory of femdom (femdom being a tag that has since been aliased to dominant_female).

Many of the posts tagged with gentle_femdom don't seem to be valid for dominant_female/dominant. It's actually a fairly widespread issue I see with dominant and submissive being way over-tagged, with them being on posts of simple plain sex just because someone's being a bit forward or taking a dick, or because there's dialog indicating some BDSM play but nothing actually visible (and text isn't supposed to substitute TWYS; if you don't see BDSM stuff, text mentioning it isn't a reason to tag it).

Can this be a gender neutral tag? gentle_domination or something? And then it could be combined with dominant_female or whatever other gender.

wandering_spaniel said:
Can this be a gender neutral tag? gentle_domination or something? And then it could be combined with dominant_female or whatever other gender.

yeah, +1 to this.

The bulk update request #8638 is pending approval.

create alias gentle_femdom (975) -> gentle_domination (0) # has blocking transitive relationships, cannot be applied through bur
create implication gentle_domination (0) -> dominant (141718)

Reason: OP needs to be rejected first

Gender neutral version which can be combined with dominant_<gender> in searches. This is a really common kink so I do think it's definitely worth having a tag for it.

I'm having same issue as Watsit on this. A lot of those shouldn't count as domination, and adding 'soft domination' waters down the usage further. A character taking an active role in sex isn't automatically domination.

How would it even be defined? The current wiki for gentle_femdom is: For when female domination is taking place, but the domination in question is soft and affectionate, rather than domineering. ...non-domineering domination? How is that domination at all then? Sounds like this just confuses top with dom.