The tag implication #43642 maleficent -> maleficent_(disney) has been rejected.

Reason: The maleficent tag should also have the maleficent_(disney) copyright

EDIT: The tag implication maleficent -> maleficent_(disney) (forum #329850) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.

Except she also appears in other Disney media, such as Disney's animated film Sleeping Beauty, Kingdom Hearts, Disney's Descendants, and various others.

clawstripe said:
Except she also appears in other Disney media, such as Disney's animated film Sleeping Beauty, Kingdom Hearts, Disney's Descendants, and various others.

Maleficent specifically originated in sleeping_beauty, where she was the antagonist. If she's going to imply any particular media, it should be that major original.

Is there anything even unique and new to the Maleficent movie that it needs its own tag? If not, it should be aliased to maleficent.

furrin_gok said:
Maleficent specifically originated in sleeping_beauty, where she was the antagonist. If she's going to imply any particular media, it should be that major original.

It already does.

Is there anything even unique and new to the Maleficent movie that it needs its own tag? If not, it should be aliased to maleficent.

I think it’s possible for an image to depict something like a recognizable setting or the particular art style from the movie that would warrant the inclusion of the specific copyright tag.

The tag implication maleficent -> maleficent_(disney) (forum #329850) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.