Aliasing rocks → rock
Link to alias
Reason:
I'm neutral to this one, just thought I'd throw it out there.
Updated by JoeX
Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
Aliasing rocks → rock
Link to alias
I'm neutral to this one, just thought I'd throw it out there.
Updated by JoeX
Approved.
Note for future: I did notice that some images have an especially large rock, or one that seems prominent. But "rock" vs "rocks" isn't an obvious place to make a distinction. So if we ever find we need to tag the especially large or prominent type of rocks separately from regular smaller rocks, then we can use something like boulder for it instead and implicate it to --> rock as a more specific subtype. Which would be a whole lot clearer than trying to do "rock" vs "rocks".
Updated by anonymous
There is only 27 of boulder, but any reason why we can't implicate that anyways?
(note that there's also boulder_(mlp) which is, quite obviously, also a boulder)
Updated by anonymous
parasprite said:
There is only 27 of boulder, but any reason why we can't implicate that anyways?(note that there's also boulder_(mlp) which is, quite obviously, also a boulder)
Yeah, might as well do it now while we're in the neighborhood. So approved an implication of boulder to --> rock.
Updated by anonymous
I like these aliases. They rock.
Updated by anonymous