Topic: Is the Site Email Being Checked?

Posted under General

This topic has been locked.

I've been waiting nearly a month for someone to respond to my email, seems like if the mods were checking it regularly I'd have gotten a response by now. Actually I have no idea who has access to it or how much, if any, backlog there is.

Updated by bitWolfy

Your email hasn't gotten a reply yet because every time I open it I'm at a loss of words on how to nicely tell you that your own behavior is the source of the problem.

If I can be really blunt here, calling other people's kinks or fetishes disgusting in a thread focused on discussing the presence of said fetishes on other websites is a surefire way to get yourself marked for being disruptive. Your comments in that thread offered nothing of value to the discussion taking place since you attacked other people's likes, instead of trying to further the thread by providing actual arguments, insights, or anything else of value.

notmenotyou said:
Your email hasn't gotten a reply yet because every time I open it I'm at a loss of words on how to nicely tell you that your own behavior is the source of the problem.

If I can be really blunt here, calling other people's kinks or fetishes disgusting in a thread focused on discussing the presence of said fetishes on other websites is a surefire way to get yourself marked for being disruptive. Your comments in that thread offered nothing of value to the discussion taking place since you attacked other people's likes, instead of trying to further the thread by providing actual arguments, insights, or anything else of value.

Okay so I kinda understand where you're coming from but the aspect being glossed over here is morality. With those fetishes I have a pretty strong belief that morality is questionable and of course that's a major reason why I don't participate in them. Furthermore, making the argument that I must somehow like those fetishes because I'm speaking out against them is asinine and an attack on my character. Surely you can see why I reacted the way I did.

And I don't think my comments in that thread were just "ur fetishes r stupid" I said a lot more than that. I explained why other sites did not feature said fetishes and countered the argument that not having certain fetishes would essentially be a recipe for failure.

You and I both know that while my opinions can be rather blunt with my opinions I'm generally well-behaved. Of course I flew off the handle with that kangaroo issue years ago, I haven't forgotten that. So I'd like to appeal to your humanity. Maybe we forget about this negative mark, maybe I drop the whole fetish talk. I'm not out here to cause trouble, I promise I'll do better.

  • Quite frankly I don't know why anyone supports this stuff, it's disgusting to even imagine yourself screwing a minor.
  • A lot of these things are disgusting behaviors in the first place. I don't mind if you're not glorifying things that no human should be fine with.

"I don't like these things" never means "Nobody should like these things". There's nothing "well behaved" about trying to control the opinions of others or claiming that your beliefs are the only ones valid.

furrin_gok said:
"I don't like these things" never means "Nobody should like these things". There's nothing "well behaved" about trying to control the opinions of others or claiming that your beliefs are the only ones valid.

Psst, you're being baited.

Let him have his pity party.

notmenotyou said:
Your email hasn't gotten a reply yet because every time I open it I'm at a loss of words on how to nicely tell you that your own behavior is the source of the problem.

Mine were not replied either.

lonelylupine said:
Psst, you're being baited.

Let him have his pity party.

I'm not baiting anyone with this forum post. It was a simple question and it received an answer, which I responded to.

furrin_gok said:
"I don't like these things" never means "Nobody should like these things". There's nothing "well behaved" about trying to control the opinions of others or claiming that your beliefs are the only ones valid.

You have your opinion and I have mine. I'm not claiming to be better than anyone or attempting to control anyone. I only stated a reason for hating specific fetishes. Of course while we're on the subject of behavior, I suppose seeing one bad forum post defines me as an individual, according to you?

pheagleadler said:
You have your opinion and I have mine. I'm not claiming to be better than anyone or attempting to control anyone. I only stated a reason for hating specific fetishes. Of course while we're on the subject of behavior, I suppose seeing one bad forum post defines me as an individual, according to you?

The individual forum posts that you got a record for deserves you of a record, rather. It does seem as if you are complaining that you have records because of those posts, after all.

Updated

furrin_gok said:
The individual forum posts that you got a record for deserves you of a record, rather. It does seem as if you are complaining that you have records because of those posts, after all.

I disagree with a moderation decision that's all it is. Maybe it could have been a warning, I think a neg was a step too far. But I've already made a mod aware of that and apologized.

pheagleadler said:
I disagree with a moderation decision that's all it is. Maybe it could have been a warning, I think a neg was a step too far. But I've already made a mod aware of that and apologized.

But you did get a warning, but you seem to ignored that and got upset when you did it again and got a negative record for it. It doesn't seem like you want to learn from your mistake and mainly trying to sneak one's way out of your actions have consequences.

the_shinx said:
But you did get a warning, but you seem to ignored that and got upset when you did it again and got a negative record for it. It doesn't seem like you want to learn from your mistake and mainly trying to sneak one's way out of your actions have consequences.

You see, that would require shutting up, and his ego won't allow that. He's got to have the final word, even as he continues to dig his own grave.

Speaking as the person who reported the first of those two posts, and whose ticket Millcore quoted in the record, I'm proud to say I would do it again. If you want a hope in hell of getting those records removed, you will first need to understand that you have done anything wrong, let alone exactly what.

Updated

pheagleadler said:
Maybe it could have been a warning, I think a neg was a step too far.

That's exactly what you got:

Rules - Disciplinary Actions

  • Notification (neutral record): This will serve as an advisement that you have violated the Code of Conduct.

...

  • Warning (negative record): This will serve an official warning that you violated the Code of Conduct.

lonelylupine said:
You see, that would require shutting up, and his ego won't allow that. He's got to have the final word, even as he continues to dig his own grave.

Don't.

the_shinx said:
But you did get a warning, but you seem to ignored that and got upset when you did it again and got a negative record for it. It doesn't seem like you want to learn from your mistake and mainly trying to sneak one's way out of your actions have consequences.

Did it again? It's not even the same fucking thread, mate.

lonelylupine said:
You see, that would require shutting up, and his ego won't allow that. He's got to have the final word, even as he continues to dig his own grave.

I got a lovely idea, why don't you find someone else to pester and leave me alone? You see any of my posts, just scroll on by. Because honestly I'm getting really goddamn sick of your shit.

wat8548 said:
Speaking as the person who reported the first of those two posts, and whose ticket Millcore quoted in the record, I'm proud to say I would do it again. If you want a hope in hell of getting those records removed, you will first need to understand that you have done anything wrong, let alone exactly what.

You're proud to say you'd report people, is that what gets you off? Have you, I dunno, considered talking to me? I'm not a fucking robot.

pheagleadler said:
You're proud to say you'd report people, is that what gets you off? Have you, I dunno, considered talking to me? I'm not a fucking robot.

It's generally not a good idea for non-staff to DM users telling them how to act, and starting that type of discussion in a thread runs the risk of stirring drama up. Really the best solution is to just repot something that doesn't fit regulations and let them handle it instead of getting yourself involved. Especially considering that, well users aren't always right. Making a scene then finding out your wrong puts yourself in the dunce hat, been there would rather not again personally lol.

versperus said:

It's generally not a good idea for non-staff to DM users telling them how to act, and starting that type of discussion in a thread runs the risk of stirring drama up. Really the best solution is to just repot something that doesn't fit regulations and let them handle it instead of getting yourself involved. Especially considering that, well users aren't always right. Making a scene then finding out your wrong puts yourself in the dunce hat, been there would rather not again personally lol.

I don't mind if someone wants to DM me and talk to me, I'm not saying they should tell me how to act but a polite conversation on what they feel I did wrong doesn't seem out of the question.

versperus said:
Especially considering that, well users aren't always right. Making a scene then finding out your wrong puts yourself in the dunce hat, been there would rather not again personally lol

I feel that ^^' There was one comment by me, three years ago, I still think about some times in embarrassment :D
(at least this changed my behavior from bitching around, to asking how it works)

versperus said:

It's generally not a good idea for non-staff to DM users telling them how to act

Not that it stopped him doing it anyway LOL:

PheagleAdler said:

Kay, so apparently you and I have a little problem here. One that I'd like to resolve amicably, but I feel obviously the way you responded to me in that thread would not achieve that. If you want to talk to me about this in greater detail I do check the site regularly so please. I'm sure we can resolve this. I don't want to get reported and hopefully you're not really the type of person to just revel in reporting people.

Consider this: if you don't want to get reported, try not breaking the rules? Not sure what the hell power you think I have in this situation anyway, I'm just eating popcorn over here.

wat8548 said:
Not that it stopped him doing it anyway LOL:

Consider this: if you don't want to get reported, try not breaking the rules? Not sure what the hell power you think I have in this situation anyway, I'm just eating popcorn over here.

I mean you reported me. Who's to say I'd have gotten reported at all? I'm not the only one who was speaking out against those kinks, and yet I seem to have been singled out.

pheagleadler said:
I mean you reported me. Who's to say I'd have gotten reported at all?

Whoever filed the second report that your post also got? Whoever reported your other post?

EDIT: Also, reports aren't magic. Staff can and do reject reports filed for invalid reasons, and take action against disruptive users without the help of a report.

pheagleadler said:
I'm not the only one who was speaking out against those kinks, and yet I seem to have been singled out.

Objectively untrue. I recommend perusing the feedback sections of everyone who was supporting you in that thread, particularly the one who is now banned.

pheagleadler said:
I mean you reported me. Who's to say I'd have gotten reported at all? I'm not the only one who was speaking out against those kinks, and yet I seem to have been singled out.

I think I reported you too back then... and no, you are not singled out. Just look into the ticket queue. There are so many people who get reported because they start the good old "I dOnT LiKe ThIs FeTiSh" discussion. You are not special.

dubsthefox said:
I think I reported you too back then... and no, you are not singled out. Just look into the ticket queue. There are so many people who get reported because they start the good old "I dOnT LiKe ThIs FeTiSh" discussion. You are not special.

Good then I suppose?

wat8548 said:
Whoever filed the second report that your post also got? Whoever reported your other post?

EDIT: Also, reports aren't magic. Staff can and do reject reports filed for invalid reasons, and take action against disruptive users without the help of a report.

Objectively untrue. I recommend perusing the feedback sections of everyone who was supporting you in that thread, particularly the one who is now banned.

The thread I got the record for? I don't see anyone banned in that thread at all.
The thread I got the warning for? Sure I see that scalielover guy but dude's been all over the place, it's not just for supporting me.

OwO What is this? https://e621.net/tickets/108438

I don't want to argue with you and I can't see who filed any report. Quite frankly I'm surprised I can see any reports. That's one thing FA doesn't do is show ticket backlog.

I'm in agreement that I may have gone too far but I didn't think it warranted a negative record. But this thread hasn't helped aside from getting NMNY to offer an explanation why he ignored my emails.

pheagleadler said:
I'm in agreement that I may have gone too far but I didn't think it warranted a negative record. But this thread hasn't helped aside from getting NMNY to offer an explanation why he ignored my emails.

How many different people have to explain to you that you got a negative record because you ignored the neutral one and did the exact same thing again?

wat8548 said:
How many different people have to explain to you that you got a negative record because you ignored the neutral one and did the exact same thing again?

We can agree to disagree. It was on the same subject perhaps but it wasn't the exact same comment or even the same thread. Furthermore, the second was in response to something Lance said about "furries being in denial" about their fetishes, of which I am not.

bitWolfy

Former Staff

You know what, enough is enough.

I don't see this thread going anywhere productive, it's just same things being repeated over and over.
You received a response already.

You can say that "we can agree to disagree" all you want, but at the end of the day, when using this site you must adhere to its rules.
And if you continue to break those rules, you will be banned from the site.

  • 1