Topic: can we make an exeption for norm waterberg?

Posted under Art Talk

Note that approved posts with this tag are usually part of a comic or a pool. Some of these posts may be transformation-related. Some human only posts may also be from before 2015 and the introduction of minimum quality standards to e621, in which case these posts were grandfathered in. Either way, humans are not the focus of this site, and uploading these posts without any other related posts that feature non-humans are very likely to be deleted, no matter what the content or quality. Make sure to read our uploading guidelines before proceeding to upload a human only post.

lafcadio said:
Note that approved posts with this tag are usually part of a comic or a pool. Some of these posts may be transformation-related. Some human only posts may also be from before 2015 and the introduction of minimum quality standards to e621, in which case these posts were grandfathered in. Either way, humans are not the focus of this site, and uploading these posts without any other related posts that feature non-humans are very likely to be deleted, no matter what the content or quality. Make sure to read our uploading guidelines before proceeding to upload a human only post.

makes sense for sure, now i'm just wondering if simply being parent/childed with post #3267388 or the two being merged into one post would make for good enough context?

Probably the best thing to do is to link to the Norm Waterberg ref sheet in the xXSparklina AngelnightXx post's description and/or comments. One could also fill out the norm_waterberg wiki and have a link there to the picture.

clawstripe said:
Probably the best thing to do is to link to the Norm Waterberg ref sheet in the xXSparklina AngelnightXx post's description and/or comments. One could also fill out the norm_waterberg wiki and have a link there to the picture.

i think you're right. i should start linking to norm waterberg's ref sheet wherever i go, like a ref-sheet preacher (not nearly as spammy though, i'm not that malicious)

starting here

  • 1