The tag alias #57469 kabeshiri -> through_wall has been approved.

Reason: Same meaning under different names

EDIT: The tag alias kabeshiri -> through_wall (forum #333207) has been approved by @slyroon.

post #3218885
Is it still kabeshiri when it's a door? If not, the alias works, but if so, it should be a reversed implication.

The opposite alias was suggested before and people were against aliasing them together IIRC.
Unfortunately though, the OP for that topic hid the thread to troll everyone, see topic #32958.

I'm just going to bump this as I was about to request this alias.

these tags seem to have identical use cases and kabeshiri's wikipage even states that through_wall is the english version of this tag.

thegreatwolfgang said:
see topic #32958.

no i cannot

thegreatwolfgang said:
see topic #32958.

why is access denied?

hjfduitloxtrds said:
why is access denied?

OP deleted the forum topic.

The tag alias kabeshiri -> through_wall (forum #333207) has been approved by @slyroon.

The bulk update request #6824 is pending approval.

create alias reverse_kabeshiri (97) -> through_wall (5546) # duplicate of alias #59413

Reason: If kabeshiri is going, this should go too

snpthecat said:
The bulk update request #6824 is pending approval.

create alias reverse_kabeshiri (97) -> through_wall (5546) # duplicate of alias #59413

Reason: If kabeshiri is going, this should go too

Let's not nuke a useful niche tag that otherwise would be difficult to search.

crocogator said:
Let's not nuke a useful niche tag that otherwise would be difficult to search.

Would through_wall+from_front_position work?

strikerman said:
no i cannot

Check again
Though can't janitors seem hidden topics?

watsit said:
Would through_wall+from_front_position work?

through_wall from_front_position is quite the mess, with most of the posts effectively what kabeshiri was meant to be, and a few being the tags separately. Seems to be pretty poorly tagged.

watsit said:
Would through_wall+from_front_position work?

Is sex required? I've used it for public_use stuff where the character is stuck through_wall with their mouth exposed to be used, regardless of whether sex was actually occurring.

post #2747346

crocogator said:
Is sex required? I've used it for public_use stuff where the character is stuck through_wall with their mouth exposed to be used, regardless of whether sex was actually occurring.

post #2747346

I'm not really sure if that post really fits the definition of through_wall/reverse_kabeshiri anyway; those are for characters' full body being though a wall, with roughly half on each side. this is closer to a glory_hole.

sipothac said:
I'm not really sure if that post really fits the definition of through_wall/reverse_kabeshiri anyway; those are for characters' full body being though a wall, with roughly half on each side. this is closer to a glory_hole.

Maybe. I just think there should be a tag for bound public_use stuff, where the "hole" available to be used is specifically the character's mouth. If reverse_kabeshiri is not right for that, maybe we need a new tag. A public_mouth_use oral_public_use(?), or something. I'll change my BUR vote from downvote to meh.