The tag implication #44170 huge_hips -> wide_hips has been approved.

Reason: Results with the huge_hips tag without the wide_hips tag will not appear when a user searchs the wide_hips tag, nor get it when someone tags a post with huge_hips, but without the latter.

The tag kinda resides on slight proportion variations, but a person searching for wide_hips might also be interested in getting huge_hips results, the same way huge_thighs can get results from thick_thighs, huge_breasts from big_breasts, etc.

The quantity of results that have this problem is fairly small, but making the implication would fix it for the current posts that have one of the tags and is missing the other.

If this request is appropiate, maybe you should consider also adding an implication from hyper_hips to huge_hips.

EDIT: The tag implication huge_hips -> wide_hips (forum #333346) has been approved by @slyroon.

I was about to make this same request. I find it quite odd that huge_breasts implies big_breasts, huge_thighs implies thick_thighs and huge_butt implies big_butt but huge_hips does not imply wide_hips.
Seems like a baffling inconsistency and I'm surprised this hasn't been resolved yet. So here is a bump.

The tag implication huge_hips -> wide_hips (forum #333346) has been approved by @slyroon.