Implicating Reverse_cowgirl_position → Straddling
Link to implication

Reason:

Is this one we want to go ahead with? What do we consider "straddling" to be?

https://e621.net/post/index/1/reverse_cowgirl_position%20-straddling has several pictures where the person on top isn't technically "straddling" the person below, as their legs may just be held out in front without actually straddling anything: https://e621.net/post/show/484305/

I would think no to this, right?

That does seem problematic.

But many of the images under 'reverse_cowgirl_position -straddling' seem to be mistagged. There's some stand_and_carry_position mixed in, and many that would better fit under chair_position.

So if the tag got cleaned, I think this implication might still work.

Edit: Nah, never mind. There'll still be some cases of reverse cowgirl that just can't be tagged as straddling. So, I'd say no to this implication.

I'd agree, no.

Implication denied because reverse_cowgirl_position doesn't actually require the person on top to be straddling the other person's torso. Their legs can be between or even resting on top of their partner's legs. Only some are examples of straddling, which isn't enough for an implication.