Implicating rimming → anal_sex
Link to implication

Reason:

Against.

Anal sex is aliased to anal penetration, and rimming shouldn't be implicated to that.

Genjar said:
Against.

Anal sex is aliased to anal penetration, and rimming shouldn't be implicated to that.

And rimming already implies anal so this should be fine.

OP: I think you're looking for the anal tag.

Sort of off topic to this post, but butt_sex, buttsex, buttsecks and ass_sex all seem to be aliased to anal. Should they not be aliased to anal_penetration like anal_sex is?

Alija_Izetbegović said:
Sort of off topic to this post, but butt_sex, buttsex, buttsecks and ass_sex all seem to be aliased to anal. Should they not be aliased to anal_penetration like anal_sex is?

Probably, but The kind of person to tag something buttsecks is probably also going to tag it ob something that isn't either. But maybe I'm just cynical today.

Denied because "anal_sex" was already aliased away to --> anal_penetration, which rimming is not an example of.

I'd normally just implicate rimming to --> anal since I think that's what you probably meant, but it's already been done. So the idea was good, but it's already been handled. =)