1. Last time I uploaded post #3288129 there was a comment complaining about me not tagging eunuch. But as far as I know nullo is all it needed from my interpretation of the tag wiki pages. Did I misunderstand the tag, and that if both the penis and testicles are removed the tag eunuch still applies? (But if so I would expect there to be an implication nullo -> eunuch, yet this is not added.)
2. For post #3314404 (which is the continuation of the previously mentioned post) you can just barely see a part of the scar, but none of the panels on the page explicitly shown the lack of penis and/or balls (some may say the scar implies the balls are gone). Should it be tagged nullo and/or eunuch at all?

stupidmelon said:
1. Last time I uploaded post #3288129 there was a comment complaining about me not tagging eunuch. But as far as I know nullo is all it needed from my interpretation of the tag wiki pages. Did I misunderstand the tag, and that if both the penis and testicles are removed the tag eunuch still applies? (But if so I would expect there to be an implication nullo -> eunuch, yet this is not added.)

Nullo cannot imply penectomy/eunuch because it has to be applicable to female characters too. I suppose penectomy and eunuch would be valid tags there though.

If you think the scar is distinct enough on the second post then go with eunuch, but I don't think that's enough for nullo.