Implicating cock_transformation → transformation
Link to implication

Reason:

Cock transformation is still transformation. Although I'm not sure if surgery counts as transformation because I've been seeing a lot of those this morning.

post #566008 post #564650

Denied for two reasons: 1, the transformation tag is only supposed to be used for when the transformation is visibly happening right then, not after the fact. While many cock_transformation pictures don't show the actual transformation process, it's just implied that it must have happened at some point before then based on the evidence of what we can see. So those images will still be cock_transformation, but don't belong under the transformation tag. Some might even be more accurately post_transformation. So this implication to --> transformation won't work on that basis alone.

Also, cock_transformation is broader in type, and it can actually include: surgical modification, absorption, merging, magic, etc. And only some of those images would qualify for the transformation tag since cock_transformation is more tagging the effect/result and transformation is tagging the occurrence. Absorption, merging can both cause cock_transformation results but are both closer to being alternative-vore hybrid tags more than strict transformation. And surgical modification is debatable whether or not it qualifies as transformation, though that might mostly be because those images are usually after-the-fact and not of the actual process itself.

furrypickle said:
Denied for two reasons: 1, the transformation tag is only supposed to be used for when the transformation is visibly happening right then, not after the fact. While many cock_transformation pictures don't show the actual transformation process, it's just implied that it must have happened at some point before then based on the evidence of what we can see. So those images will still be cock_transformation, but don't belong under the transformation tag. Some might even be more accurately post_transformation. So this implication to --> transformation won't work on that basis alone.

Also, cock_transformation is broader in type, and it can actually include: surgical modification, absorption, merging, magic, etc. And only some of those images would qualify for the transformation tag since cock_transformation is more tagging the effect/result and transformation is tagging the occurrence. Absorption, merging can both cause cock_transformation results but are both closer to being alternative-vore hybrid tags more than strict transformation. And surgical modification is debatable whether or not it qualifies as transformation, though that might mostly be because those images are usually after-the-fact and not of the actual process itself.

I suppose I would still call major surgery "transforming" if we used a broad meaning, but the reasoning you give for not implicating it is solid and I agree with your points.