Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions
The tag implication #44335 vicar_amelia_(bloodborne) -> bloodborne has been rejected.
Reason: Character from the game. For some reason vicar_amelia is implicated to bloodborne despite not being in use...
EDIT: The tag implication vicar_amelia_(bloodborne) -> bloodborne (forum #336884) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.
Updated by auto moderator
faucet said:
Reason: Character from the game. For some reason vicar_amelia is implicated to bloodborne despite not being in use...
Perhaps vicar_amelia_(bloodborne) should be aliased to vicar_amelia instead, if it's unlikely to be ambiguous?
watsit said:
Perhaps vicar_amelia_(bloodborne) should be aliased to vicar_amelia instead, if it's unlikely to be ambiguous?
Looks like it was primarily moved from vicar_amelia to vicar_amelia_(bloodborne) by ArtistClone24 ... who was permabanned for tag vandalism including "STOP removing valid tags, and nuking whole tags to replace them with unneeded suffixes."
Aliasing this to vicar_amelia might be the better option then. I don't see anything unrelated to Bloodborne when searching Vicar Amelia.
The bulk update request #2594 is active.
create alias vicar_amelia_(bloodborne) (0) -> vicar_amelia (446)
Reason: Seems to be an unnecessary disambiguation, the target tag already has an implication to bloodborne.
EDIT: The bulk update request #2594 (forum #336890) has been approved by @bitWolfy.
Updated by auto moderator
The tag implication vicar_amelia_(bloodborne) -> bloodborne (forum #336884) has been rejected by @bitWolfy.
The bulk update request #2594 (forum #336890) has been approved by @bitWolfy.
