The bulk update request #2662 has been rejected.

remove implication demon’s_souls (0) -> dark_souls (1963)

Reason: Demon's Souls and Dark Souls, despite sharing similar names and gameplay, and being developed by the same company, are totally different universes, so Demon's Souls does not imply Dark Souls. If it did, then Bloodborne -> Dark Souls, and Elden Ring -> Dark Souls, but that is not the case.

And for a possible counter-argument of "but they're looking for similar games and etc etc etc", the tag "from_software" exists for that.

EDIT: The bulk update request #2662 (forum #338015) has been rejected by @slyroon.

Firstly, that's not a tag - did you mean demons_souls?

Secondly, that's an alias, not an implication.

you can go back to the BUR and edit it to the corrections that wat8548 mentions your suggestion

versperus said:
you can go back to the BUR and edit it to the corrections that wat8548 mentions your suggestion

Shortcut to doing so is to click the bulk update request #2662 link at the top of the post including it. Or be lazy and click the link I just supplied if you're learning about it by reading this comment.

You can find it among the BUR List by searching for your own username as the requestor, and optionally a bit extra in the search field to narrow it down, such as [Script: dark_souls]

wat8548 said:
Firstly, that's not a tag - did you mean demons_souls?

The irony being that demon's_souls would be more accurate. If the alias got removed, I'd probably say alias demons_souls -> demon's_souls. Assuming it got removed. Personally not familiar with anything that came after Demon's Souls, so I can't comment on whether or not an unalias would be valid.

The bulk update request #2662 (forum #338015) has been rejected by @slyroon.