The tag alias #57791 heavily_excessive_cum -> hyper_cum has been approved.

Reason: The two tags seem to mean the same thing, a distinction without a difference

EDIT: The tag alias heavily_excessive_cum -> hyper_cum (forum #338097) has been approved by @slyroon.

alias them both to mega_nuttt

I think an alias to cum would be better, since there are cases where you only see some of it or a very small amount. Or maybe invalidate it, since it seems to also be used when you can't see any cum at all.

watsit said:
I think an alias to cum would be better, since there are cases where you only see some of it or a very small amount. Or maybe invalidate it, since it seems to also be used when you can't see any cum at all.

I’d say all of those are just mistags. The last two examples are also tagged cum when they shouldn’t be, as none is visible at all.

watsit said:
I think an alias to cum would be better, since there are cases where you only see some of it or a very small amount. Or maybe invalidate it, since it seems to also be used when you can't see any cum at all.

Those should only be cum_inflation. I agree with scalie, just because people tagged those wrong doesn't make it a bad tag.

The tag alias heavily_excessive_cum -> hyper_cum (forum #338097) has been approved by @slyroon.