Topic: begging_* BUR

Posted under Tag Alias and Implication Suggestions

OmegaUmbra

Member

The bulk update request #2844 is pending approval.

create implication begging_for_death (20) -> begging (5499)
create implication begging_to_cum (135) -> begging (5499)
create implication begging_for_anal (75) -> begging (5499)
create implication begging_not_to_stop (61) -> begging (5499)
create implication begging_for_sex (232) -> begging (5499)
create implication begging_for_mercy (775) -> begging (5499)
create implication begging_for_more (844) -> begging (5499) # duplicate of implication #32025
create implication begging_to_stop (382) -> begging (5499)

Reason: begging_* will always involve begging.

begging pose already implies begging, so I believe the remaining ones shouldn't be a problem.

OmegaUmbra

Member

# duplicate of implication #32025

idk what is easier for the staff: reject the solo implication and aprove a BUR, or remove the duplicate from the BUR. I can remove it from the BUR if it's better.

Waydence

Member

omegaumbra said:
idk what is easier for the staff: reject the solo implication and aprove a BUR, or remove the duplicate from the BUR. I can remove it from the BUR if it's better.

Maybe it's best to link single-implication topics to full BURs so they can make decisions quicker? Can't hurt to try I guess.

  • 1